Femtobytes
Problem type

Limit of a function from the epsilon-delta definition

What it solves
Prove that a polynomial (a straight line, a quadratic or a cubic) has the limit you expect at a point, using only the epsilon-delta definition: for every output tolerance epsilon, find an input tolerance delta that guarantees it.
Subject
Real Analysis
Topic
Limits from the definition
Also called
epsilon delta, limit of a function, continuity from the definition
Your problem

Prove this limit using only the epsilon-delta definition, then try the proof out with the tolerance ε=1100\varepsilon = \frac{1}{100}.

lim⁡x→3(−3x2−3x−5)=−41\lim_{x \to 3} \left( -3 x^{2} - 3 x - 5 \right) = -41
Invent a new one:
The problem

Prove this limit using only the epsilon-delta definition, then try the proof out with the tolerance ε=1100\varepsilon = \frac{1}{100}.

lim⁡x→3(−3x2−3x−5)=−41\lim_{x \to 3} \left( -3 x^{2} - 3 x - 5 \right) = -41
The result
lim⁡x→3(−3x2−3x−5)=−41\lim_{x \to 3} \left( -3 x^{2} - 3 x - 5 \right) = -41

Proved. Given any tolerance ε>0\varepsilon > 0, the choice δ=min⁡{1,  ε24}\delta = \min\left\{ 1, \; \frac{\varepsilon}{24} \right\} works.

checked 18 lines of this solution were evaluated with exact arithmetic before it was shown to you. A solution with a false line is never served.
Picture 1 of 2Step 1: Find the candidate limit, then say exactly what must be proved
L + εL = -41L − εc − δc = 3c + δinput xoutput f(x)
The graph of the function near the point. The upright strip is the input window of half-width delta; the level band is the output tolerance of half-width epsilon. Inside the strip the graph never leaves the band. Here c=3c = 3, L=−41L = -41, ε=1100\varepsilon = \frac{1}{100} and δ=12400\delta = \frac{1}{2400}. The bright part of the graph is the part inside the strip. The hollow circle marks the point itself, which the definition leaves out.
1

Find the candidate limit, then say exactly what must be proved

Why this step

The definition can only CHECK a number we propose; it never hands us one. For a polynomial the natural candidate is the value at the point itself, because a polynomial is built from nothing but adding and multiplying, and neither of those can make a sudden jump. That is a belief. The proof turns it into a fact.

Put x=3x = 3 into the function:

−3⋅32−3⋅3−5\displaystyle -3 \cdot 3^{2} - 3 \cdot 3 - 5==−3⋅9−3⋅3−5\displaystyle -3 \cdot 9 - 3 \cdot 3 - 5
Work out each power of 33 first. Powers come before multiplying, and multiplying before adding. checked
==−27−9−5\displaystyle -27 - 9 - 5
Do each multiplication. checked
==−41\displaystyle -41
Add the numbers up. checked
Claim: lim⁡x→3(−3x2−3x−5)=−41\text{Claim: } \lim_{x \to 3} \left( -3 x^{2} - 3 x - 5 \right) = -41
This is what we will prove, with c=3c = 3 and L=−41L = -41.
2

Rewrite everything in terms of the distance from c

Why this step

We control one thing only: how far xx is from 33. But ff is written in powers of xx, which hides that distance. So we give the distance a name, h=x−3h = x - 3, and rewrite the function in powers of hh. After this the quantity we control is the only letter on the page.

From h=x−3h = x - 3 we get x=3+hx = 3 + h. The condition 0<∣x−c∣<δ0 < \left| x - c \right| < \delta becomes simply 0<∣h∣<δ0 < \left| h \right| < \delta.

−3x2−3x−5−(−41)\displaystyle -3 x^{2} - 3 x - 5 - \left( -41 \right)==−3(3+h)2−3(3+h)−5−(−41)\displaystyle -3 \left( 3 + h \right)^{2} - 3 \left( 3 + h \right) - 5 - \left( -41 \right)
Replace every xx by 3+h3 + h. checked
==−3(9+6h+h2)−3(3+h)−5−(−41)\displaystyle -3 \left( 9 + 6 h + h^{2} \right) - 3 \left( 3 + h \right) - 5 - \left( -41 \right)
Multiply out the square: (u+h)2=u2+2uh+h2(u + h)^2 = u^2 + 2uh + h^2 with u=3u = 3. checked
==−3h2−18h−27−3h−9−5−(−41)\displaystyle -3 h^{2} - 18 h - 27 - 3 h - 9 - 5 - \left( -41 \right)
Multiply each bracket by the number in front of it. A minus sign in front reaches every term inside. checked
==−3h2−21h\displaystyle -3 h^{2} - 21 h
Collect the terms with the same power of hh. The plain numbers add up to exactly 00, and that is no accident: they are f(3)−Lf(3) - L, and we CHOSE L=f(3)L = f(3). A wrong candidate for LL would leave a number here that no δ\delta could ever shrink. checked
==h(−3h−21)\displaystyle h \left( -3 h - 21 \right)
Every remaining term contains hh, so take hh out as a common factor. checked
∣−3x2−3x−5−(−41)∣=∣h∣⋅∣−3h−21∣\left| -3 x^{2} - 3 x - 5 - \left( -41 \right) \right| = \left| h \right| \cdot \left| -3 h - 21 \right|
Take absolute values. The absolute value of a product is the product of the absolute values. checked
3

Cage the second factor

4

Rough work: choose delta

5

The proof, written forwards

6

Test the rule with a real tolerance