Femtobytes
Problem type

Limit of a function from the epsilon-delta definition

What it solves
Prove that a polynomial (a straight line, a quadratic or a cubic) has the limit you expect at a point, using only the epsilon-delta definition: for every output tolerance epsilon, find an input tolerance delta that guarantees it.
Subject
Real Analysis
Topic
Limits from the definition
Also called
epsilon delta, limit of a function, continuity from the definition
Your problem

Prove this limit using only the epsilon-delta definition, then try the proof out with the tolerance ε=110\varepsilon = \frac{1}{10}.

lim⁡x→2(−7x−5)=−19\lim_{x \to 2} \left( -7 x - 5 \right) = -19
Invent a new one:
The problem

Prove this limit using only the epsilon-delta definition, then try the proof out with the tolerance ε=110\varepsilon = \frac{1}{10}.

lim⁡x→2(−7x−5)=−19\lim_{x \to 2} \left( -7 x - 5 \right) = -19
The result
lim⁡x→2(−7x−5)=−19\lim_{x \to 2} \left( -7 x - 5 \right) = -19

Proved. Given any tolerance ε>0\varepsilon > 0, the choice δ=ε7\delta = \frac{\varepsilon}{7} works.

checked 9 lines of this solution were evaluated with exact arithmetic before it was shown to you. A solution with a false line is never served.
Picture 1 of 2Step 1: Find the candidate limit, then say exactly what must be proved
L + εL = -19L − εc − δc = 2c + δinput xoutput f(x)
The graph of the function near the point. The upright strip is the input window of half-width delta; the level band is the output tolerance of half-width epsilon. Inside the strip the graph never leaves the band. Here c=2c = 2, L=−19L = -19, ε=110\varepsilon = \frac{1}{10} and δ=170\delta = \frac{1}{70}. The bright part of the graph is the part inside the strip. The hollow circle marks the point itself, which the definition leaves out.
1

Find the candidate limit, then say exactly what must be proved

Why this step

The definition can only CHECK a number we propose; it never hands us one. For a polynomial the natural candidate is the value at the point itself, because a polynomial is built from nothing but adding and multiplying, and neither of those can make a sudden jump. That is a belief. The proof turns it into a fact.

Put x=2x = 2 into the function:

−7⋅2−5\displaystyle -7 \cdot 2 - 5==−14−5\displaystyle -14 - 5
Do each multiplication. checked
==−19\displaystyle -19
Add the numbers up. checked
Claim: lim⁡x→2(−7x−5)=−19\text{Claim: } \lim_{x \to 2} \left( -7 x - 5 \right) = -19
This is what we will prove, with c=2c = 2 and L=−19L = -19.
2

Measure the distance between an output and the limit

Why this step

The definition is about one quantity only, ∣f(x)−L∣\left| f(x) - L \right|. We do not control it directly; we only control how close xx is to cc. So we rewrite the output distance until the input distance ∣x−c∣\left| x - c \right| appears inside it. Then controlling one controls the other.

∣−7x−5−(−19)∣\displaystyle \left| -7 x - 5 - \left( -19 \right) \right|==∣−7x+14∣\displaystyle \left| -7 x + 14 \right|
Combine the plain numbers: −5−(−19)=14-5 - \left( -19 \right) = 14. checked
==∣−7(x−2)∣\displaystyle \left| -7 \left( x - 2 \right) \right|
Take out the common factor −7-7. Check by multiplying back: −7⋅(−2)=14-7 \cdot \left( -2 \right) = 14. checked
==7∣x−2∣\displaystyle 7 \left| x - 2 \right|
The absolute value of a product is the product of the absolute values, and ∣−7∣=7\left| -7 \right| = 7. checked
3

Rough work: how close must x be kept?

4

The proof, written forwards

5

Test the rule with a real tolerance